Search for: "Powers et al v. Crawford County"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2011, 6:00 am
Crawford v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 8:03 am
The case was Los Angeles County v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 4:48 pm
Guests: Lawrence Norden: New York University Law School, @BrennanCenter Hans von Spakovsky: Heritage Foundation, @HvonSpakovsky Jon Husted: State of Ohio, @OhioSOSHusted Jonathan Chait: New York magazine, @jonathanchait Hilary Shelton: NAACP, @HilaryOShelton Links: CalTech/MIT on voter registration and its effect on turnout 1984 NY Grand Jury report on voter fraud, Election Law blog on Von Spakovsky on voter fraud in New York Crawford et al. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm
Lenge et al. in oppositionBrief of respondents Audrey Blondin et al. in oppositionPetitioners' reply Note: Goldstein, Howe & Russell, P.C. serves as counsel to the petitioners in the following case, which is listed without regard to its likelihood of being granted.Title: Council Tree Investors, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:13 am
Title: Al-Odah v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 1:10 pm
[6] Crawford et al. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 1:34 pm
32) [9] In McIntyre et al. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 1:31 pm
Gore; Crawford/Husted; Gill/Benisek, et al. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:03 am
Reynolds, et al. -- immunity of wholesale discount prices to challenge under Robinson-Patman Act solely because they are available to all buyers. 06-1617, Gilles v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am
Petitioner's reply Docket: 09-350 Title: Los Angeles County v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:15 am
PennsylvaniaDocket: 09-1396Issue(s): Whether a child's statements in an interview with a child protection agency worker investigating suspicions of past abuse are “testimonial” evidence subject to the demands of the Confrontation Clause under Crawford v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:45 am
[…]” (emphasis added)The Superior Court of Los Angeles County held (BC667011) that, because Feud tried to portray de Havilland as realistically as possible, it was not ‘transformative’ and therefore not eligible for protection under the First Amendment to the US Constitution.The decision was appealed to Court of Appeal of the State of California - Second Appellate District, which yesterday decidedto reverse the lower court’s order [the case is Olivia de… [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 10:11 am
See San Saba Energy, L.P. v. [read post]
